Aussies take direct action as Govt threatens to ‘rendition’ refugee babies to Nauru

CbAx19PUcAAocMj

Protesters outside Lady Cilento hosptal, Brisbane

A diverse movement consisting of doctors, ministers of religion, academics, writers, teachers, state premiers, anarchists and thousands of people appalled by the Australian Government’s cruel and inhumane actions in the name of ‘saving lives’ are taking direct action to end offshore detention of asylum-seekers. Ten days ago the Australian Government won a court case on technicalities that ruled the offshore gulags were legal. In the wake of that ruling the Government made it clear that it intends to proceed with the removal to Nauru of over 70 refugee children – including 37 babies. Immediately, ministers of religion across Australia offered their churches of worship as sanctuary to the familes of those threatened. Just over a week ago tens of thousands of Australians demonstrated in cities throughout the continent that saw speeches by anarchists in Melbourne calling for mass civil disobedience until offshore processing was ended. During this last week traffic on a busy highway in Melbourne was disrupted by pro-refugee abseiling protesters. Now, the latest example of this alliance of direct actionists has seen doctors at the Lady Cilento Hospital in Brisbane refusing to discharge a baby who was scalded in an accident while in Nauru and who is about to be transferred again to the gulag by Government guards…

UPDATE: Letter to Malcolm Turnbull from doctors across Australia; also story going global: France, UK, USA, Latin America…

0 retweets 0 likes

…The stand-off at the Lady Cilento hospital continues: doctors there have stated that to discharge the baby – nicknamed ‘Asha’ – would see her being removed to an unsafe environment. But in refusing to adhere to the doctors’ demands, the Government is merely succeeding in digging a deeper hole for itself.

267 asylum seekers, most of whom were held on Nauru and were brought to Australia for medical treatment, were party to the High Court challenge to the Government. They include 37 babies and 54 children. They can now be removed to Nauru after 72 hours notice.

CarFDa4UsAAd0IO

These babies are to be flown to detention facility

After the failure of the court challenge, several leading clergy offered to provide sanctuary to refugees in their churches and cathedrals. (The Federal Government refused to back down.)

Last weekend the Victorian state premier Daniel Andrews said in a letter to the Australian prime minister that the 267 asylum seekers would be welcome to stay in Victoria and that housing and other faciliities would be provided to them. Other state premiers as well as the ACT made similar offers. The Federal government, however, remains unmoved by these offers.

Last Saturday, it was reported that more than 60 Australian writers – including Nobel laureate JM Coetzee and Booker prize winners Thomas Keneally and Peter Carey – have written to the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull and immigration minister Peter Dutton condemning the government’s offshore detention policies as “brutal” and “shameful”.

Mid-week, two protesters absailed from a bridge over the Eastern Freeway in Melbourne to hang a huge banner supporting the refugees (the two remained dangling for three hours).

On Wednesday and Thursday hundreds of teachers at schools across Australia participated in school based actions, holding signs and banners saying “Let Them Stay”, “Close The Camps”, and “Education Not Detention”.

CbK8NlhW4AATWnt

Meanwhile, Australian Rabbis have backed the bid from Anglican churches to offer the group of asylum seekers sanctuary. “We stand in solidarity with the Churches across the country that have offered protection and sanctuary for the asylum seekers who face return to Nauru,” rabbis from Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide said in a joint statement. “The Jewish community knows and understands the refugee narrative too well. For, as Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has said: ‘We once stood where they now stand.’ We resist letting history repeat itself.’ As Jewish community leaders, we are deeply concerned about the group of 267 vulnerable men, women and children who may be returned to detention on Nauru. We stand proudly in defiance of such treatment.”

The wider campaign is, of course, not just about Baby Asha, or the 267 refugees who are to be returned to Nauru, but about ALL the refugees who have been kidnapped on the high seas by the Australian navy (under Government orders) and imprisoned on Nauru and Manus, as well as all the other refugees detained on the Christmas Island gulag or in the various detention centres across Australia. These refugees and asylum-seekers suffer because neither the ruling Liberal-National coalition, nor the Labor Opposition, have the slightest notion of what is right or wrong: their actions are entirely about political expediency, votes and power. Their refuge: the reactionary underbelly of racist Australia.

To see a catalogue of abuse at Nauru (and Manus Island) and Australian Government corruption, click here.

Appendix

Below are two letters by state premiers to the Australian PM.

CammPXzUYAARcmm

CagYfDmVAAA6fmg

Advertisements
This entry was posted in no category, Refugees and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Aussies take direct action as Govt threatens to ‘rendition’ refugee babies to Nauru

  1. John and Trish Highfield says:

    A “motley crew” ???? What an inappropriate use of the English language when describing a mass movement of professionals and others across the community from so many disciplines. Please, we welcome comprehensive articles on the subject – but those of us who’ve invested years of advocacy in this battle really object to be described as some sort of lesser fringe fellow-travellers. Wisde up with your journalism language.

    Like

    • Undercover1 says:

      MSM often use this term incorrectly (disparagingly) – hence a general misunderstanding of its meaning. The correct usage of ‘motley’ is: ‘made up of many different people; great diversity’. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/motley I used it here (in its correct meaning) to show that the movement was diverse and covers many layers of Australian society. Hope that clarifies. Best wishes.

      Like

      • Undercover1 says:

        However, in case others may not realise the term’s original meaning I have now replaced it with ‘diverse movement’.

        Like

  2. sylvie2449 says:

    ‘A diverse movement consisting of doctors, ministers of religion, academics, writers, teachers, state premiers and anarchists are taking direct action’…and thousands of ordinary people who are appalled by this government’s cruel and inhumane actions in the name of ‘saving lives’.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Australia in violation of UN law on arbitrary detention of refugees – urgent intervention possible | UndercoverInfo

  4. Pingback: Australia in violation of UN law on arbitrary detention of refugees – intervention possible Posted on 19 February, 2016 by Undercover1 – | winstonclose

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s