Drowned Kurdish boy on beach: the hypocrisy and the truth of what happened


One photo of one three-year old boy drowned and washed up on a beach in Turkey and the hypocrisy of the mainstream media knows no bounds. And their readership is no better. For months there have been reports of deaths at sea – not in their tens, or hundreds, but thousands – all refugees of one sort or another, crossing the Mediterranean to seek safety and a better life. It’s what anyone would do. And in all of that time the good people of Italy and Greece in particular have done what they could to help. Germany, too, has been heroic in the numbers of refugees it is taking in. In Britain, however, the conscience is finally pricked with a single image (though Government policy will remain unchanged). Thus, the past 18 months of ignoring the deaths at sea are temporarily forgotten, as also Britain’s pivotal role in helping to create the chaos in Iraq and neighbouring countries, as well as in Libya. The nice middle-class ladies of Tunbridge Wells or the trendies of Islington (apologies for the stereotyping) can express their horror and give their donations, their guilt assuaged until the next front-page photo of a three-year old child is shown dead. Meantime, they shut their eyes to the bigger picture – too difficult to comprehend. Here – below in Section C – we present just one strand of this uncomfortable story – the evidence that ISIS – one of the main perpetrators of mass violence in the middle east – was initially supported if not encouraged by the US and its allies at a time when any armed opposition to Assad and his unequivocal cruelty was considered acceptable.

First, that child… He had a name – Aylan Kurdi. He had a home: it was in Kobani. He had a brother: he was 5 years old and his name was Galip – he too drowned. They died with their mother, Rehan, and eight other refugees when their boat overturned not long after leaving Turkey for the Greek island of Kos. The father, Abdullah, survived, heartbroken. He had searched the waters for them for hours, but only discovered they had died after attending a hospital in Turkey.

UPDATE: Aylan, Galip and Rehan Kurdi have now been buried in Kobani.


Embedded image permalink

In a statement, later, Mr Kurdi said: “The things that happened to us here, in the country where we took refuge to escape war in our homeland, we want the whole world to see this. We want the world’s attention on us, so that they can prevent the same from happening to others…Let this be the last“.

The family had applied for Canadian citizenship, but their application was rejected in June. In any case, they had been unable to get an exit visa from Turkey – which is why they fled by boat. As to their home in Kobani, it was destroyed by ISIS. Their city was eventually liberated, earlier this year, by Kurdish militias – the YPJ and YPG. Both these militias are now being bombed by Turkey, who fear Kurdish nationalism. NATO is turning a blind eye to this. Europeans are largely ignorant of what is going on, seeing the effect – the 1000s of refugees – but ignoring the reality and the causes.

Aylan and his brother Galip in happier times

So will the British Government change it’s policy on refugees as a result of this latest tragedy, or because of public pressure? Don’t hold your breath: the Tory elite are an unemotional lot, brought up on the playing fields of Eton to believe that Britain is better than anywhere else and that they should do all they can to resist any more foreigners from coming into the country. (And the Government is hardly going to change direction at seeing the death of one small boy when it’s own minister in charge of benefits is happy to see over 4000 deaths as a result of welfare sanctions.)

But the Tories are completely out of step with actual Britons, who do care and are at a loss about what to do to help children such as Aylan, apart from, say, organise a modern-day sea-based or similar equivalent of Nicolas Winton’s ‘Kindertransport’. For the moment, donating to MOAS (the organisation that rescues refugees at sea) is probably the best thing.

A. The deaths at sea are in their thousands

Back in December 2014 we ran a story on the escalating deaths at sea of refugees. At that point more than 3500 refugees had died – drowned. There have been many, many more drowning since, of course. And the figures would have been worse – far worse – had it not been for the amazing work of MOAS and MSF in rescuing people in their thousands.

(Warning: the video below is VERY shocking.)

Here are the stats for 2015:

Date Location Passengers Deaths/missing
April 13 off Libya cca. 550 9/400+
April 19 off Libya 800+ 24/800
April 20 off Rhodes 93 3/?
May 3 off Libya 3500 (multiple vessels) 10+
May 5 off Catania 600 5/40
May 5 off Crotone 250 3/?
May 29 off Lampedusa 217 17/-
July 23 off Libya 283 40+
July 27 off Libya 522 13
August 1 off Libya 780 5/-
August 5 off Libya 370 26/200
August 11 off Libya 120 50/50+
August 15 off Libya 400 49
August 18 off Turkey ? 6
August 25 off Libya 571 52
August 27 off Libya 160/200+
August 30 off Libya 7
September 1 off Kos 11

In the first 6 months of 2015 alone more than 137,000 refugees attempted to cross the Mediterranan to seek asylum. Between January and March, 479 refugees and refugees drowned or went missing, as opposed to 15 during the first three months of the year before. In April the situation took an even more terrible turn with an unprecedented 1,308 refugees drowned or went missing. In May, the number of refugees drowned or missing at sea fell to 68, a quarter of the figure only one year earlier (226) – largely thanks to MOAS and MSF.


Embedded image permalink

And let’s not forget how it was only three months or so back when a UK ‘journalist’ described the refugees trying to cross into Europe as cockroaches and how British tourists in Greece were ‘disgusted’ by the sight of poverty-stricken refugees because they were spoiling their holiday.

Embedded image permalink

B. The conflict

People in the Middle East face barbaric violence, not just from ISIS but from Syrian Government forces and in the case of Kurds, from Turkey. The photo below is from the 2012 massacre that took place in Houla when Assad attacked opposition forces. The regime has also used chemical weapons against the population. There was no intervention from the West, though eventually the US and its allies began arming the Free Syrian Army (and other anti-Assad forces, many of which coalesced into ISIS – see Section C).

Some of the 49 children massacred at Houla by Assad forces

In Syria and Iraq the frontline – boots on ground – fighters against ISIS are mostly Kurds, who eventually liberated whole territories from ISIS, including the city of Kobani. During that period there was evidence that Turkey was aiding ISIS (or at best, not intervening against ISIS) and these suspicions have proven correct in that over recent weeks Turkey has conducted bombing raids against ISIS on only three occasions, compared to the several hundred bombing raids against Kurds.

  • For a comprehensive timeline of the latest war in the Iraq/Syria region, click here.
  • To see statistics on casualties, click here.
  • To access the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, click here.

Embedded image permalink

C. How ISIS was ‘created’

So, here’s the heavy bit…

According to investigative journalist Nafeez Ahmed, the US Pentagon produced a report that predicted its support for anti-Assad forces would lead to the creation of ISIS. The report provided evidence that Western governments (primarily the US and UK) formed a covert alliance with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Assad. Furthermore, US Vice President Joe Biden, admitted that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Turkey had funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Islamist rebels in Syria, that then metamorphosed into ISIS.

Noting that “the Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” the Pentagon report states that “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition,” while Russia, China and Iran “support the [Assad] regime.” The report adds: “… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).”

Ahmed concludes: “However, the newly declassified Pentagon report proves unambiguously that years before ISIS launched its concerted offensive against Iraq, the US intelligence community was fully aware that Islamist militants constituted the core of Syria’s sectarian insurgency. Despite that, the Pentagon continued to support the Islamist insurgency, even while anticipating the probability that doing so would establish an extremist Salafi stronghold in Syria and Iraq.”

According to another analysis of the Pentagon report: “In 2014, it was revealed that both Qatar and Saudi Arabia had been arming Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Qaeda’s Syrian group, and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), precursor to the Islamic State. One Qatari official said of this revelation, “ISIS has been a Saudi project.” But they haven’t been alone in their efforts. Just last month, court documents revealed Turkish intelligence officials (MIT) had accompanied illegal shipments of arms to rebel-controlled areas of Syria and had “threatened police and physically resisted” a search of the transport truck, as reported by Reuters.”

Seamus Milne of the Guardian concurs.

Also, according to Steven MacMillan: “Numerous reports in 2012 alleged that the US was sending heavy weapons from the military stockpiles of the former Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, to the Syrian rebels. Another formerly classified document released by Judicial Watch from the US Department of Defense (DOD) reveals that the White House was at least aware of arms shipments from Libya to Syria, although the document does not disclose who was shipping the weapons:

“Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles… The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]” (DOD Document)

Britain’s role in destabilising Libya (and disregarding the consequences/aftermath) has been previously reported, the consequences of which have seen thousands of refugees flee that country, seeking safe havens in Europe.

Finally…Banksy sums it up

This entry was posted in no category, Refugees, War and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Drowned Kurdish boy on beach: the hypocrisy and the truth of what happened

  1. joekano76 says:

    Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.


  2. Pingback: MUST READ: “Drowned Kurdish boy on beach: the hypocrisy and the truth of what happened” | HumansinShadow.wordpress.com

  3. curi56 says:



  4. Pingback: Refugees welcome here | What Can I Do About It?

  5. Pingback: Drowned Kurdish boy on beach: the hypocrisy and the truth of what happened – Written by UNDERCOVER1 | winstonclose

  6. I was in Syria when the Houla massacre occured. It is now believed (even in the West) that Assad’s forces had NOTHING to do with it. Despite Western media/governments saying otherwise , there is NO intelligence that Assad has used chemical weapons. At the very best, you should state that ‘it is believed’.

    Canadian government has no record of the Kurdi family’s application. Oh and the boy’s name is not Aylan. The name doesn’t exist in Syria. It’s Alan. (It means ‘rock’)

    Please, do some research before you blog. If you want to know what is going on in Syria – why not ask Syrians? http://Facebook.com/InsightIntoSyria.


    • Undercover1 says:

      1. Re. Canadian rejection, New Democratic Party (NDP) MP Fin Donnelly told the media that he had hand-delivered their file to Citizenship and Immigration Minister Chris Alexander earlier this year, but the application was rejected in June 2015: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/drowned-boys-family-sought-refuge-in-canada I agree, other sources suggest the application not received: a) Thanh Ha, Tu. “Family of drowned boy did not apply for asylum: Ottawa”. The Globe and Mail. 4 September 2015;
      “Aunt of Alan Kurdi, drowned Syrian boy, did not apply to sponsor family in Canada”. CBC News. 4 September 2015; “Canada denies Alan Kurdi’s family applied for asylum”. BBC. 4 September 2015. I agree there is some confusion here.
      2. Yes, I’ve seen the boy’s name as ‘Alan’ too, but far more widely as ‘Aylan’. It’s often the case that names are ‘Anglicised’ in the press and this appeared to be the case here. Similarly the spelling of other names – e.g. the brother Galib and the mother Rehana. The latest article, focussing on what is happening in Canada re this, is in Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omer-aziz/now-is-the-time-for-blame_b_8093904.html and I notice it uses the spellings you quote.
      3. Houla massacre: yes, there has been and still are disputes about who was behind this. One of the more detailed accounts of swhat happened was by Der Spiegel: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/a-look-back-at-the-houla-massacre-in-syria-a-845854.html The concluding para: “If the rebels had truly committed the massacre, why has the army continued to fire at and shell Taldou for months, including the days when the SPIEGEL reporters were there? And if the FSA was behind the massacre, why did a large number of army officers from Houla defect to the FSA afterwards?” This report in the Guardian suggests that the massacre was perpetrated by militia loyal to the Government: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/01/houla-massacre-reconstructing-25-may In my article I was deliberately circumspect on this matter and referred to the “massacre that took place in Houla when Assad attacked opposition forces”.
      4. Re. use of chemical weapons… as well as the HRW reference quoted in the article, here are some more details that argue they were used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.